DRSTEVE's Blog

June 11, 2008
Sometimes people ask me about my shaved head.  They wonder about the time involved and why I do it, or if I do it myself.
Lets go back in time.  When I was about 23 I noticed that my hair was thin in some spots and this caused me to eat better and use shampoos that would swell each hair up as well as keep dandruff down.  This was a ritual that I spent much time on each day, then when I reached my thirties I started to use some of that hair in a spray can stuff.  This worked fairly well but cost plenty of portraits of ole George.  This started to get tiresome, especially because my hair would get oily very quickly, but I had to keep going because I would look like a dog with mange otherwise.  On television the fools present the problem the wrong way. They imply falsehoods like, "a man feels old if his hair is thin".  This is false, at least for me.  For me it would be more like wearing clothes full of holes and patches.  It just did not look right.  Finally I had enough, I decided to take it all off and show off my naked head!  I first stood in front of a mirror and used scissors to get it very short.  It took more time to cut the sides than the top, as the top was more like a golf course than a forest.  After this I took in hand alot of soap and rubbed it in good with several applications of hot water.  Then I picked up a 3 blade razor and went at it for awhile.  I made use of a few mirrors well doing this.  I was pleased with my efforts as I did not cut myself.  Thats the background history in brief.
I have never regretted being a head nudist.  Now I just take about a minute aday while in the shower to shave my head.  I do it without a mirror!!!  Its clean, healthy, and cheap.  I almost never nick myself.  Its been about 6 years now.  Sometimes I will let the top grow for about 2 weeks just to see if its thicker or thinner.  Its just the same. 
Amen 
sb
June 02, 2008
Sorry, but the blog post could not be located.
sb
May 29, 2008

 

Not all sightings of strange man-like creatures are lies or bears standing on their back legs.  The evidences seem to varify the existence of a "bigfoot" creature.  The Roger-Patterson film seems real, indeed, it can't even be faked now, and its from the late 1960s. A little known fact about the creature in the film, dubbed Patty, is that it left a number of good prints, and some of these show toes repositioned.  The toes and feet changed in each step.  The feet and toes were not wooden fakes!!!  Other things about the film prove its not a man in a fur costume.  In regards to large prints-Several researchers have examined some of the large prints, at various sightings, and discovered some important facts.  The most important fact being that skin prints or dermal ridges can be seen!!!  To say that these prints are all fakes is plainly silly. 

Its my opinion that most of these are surviving Homo Erectus types, perhaps enlarged and more muscular.  The morphology of the Roger-Patterson creature fits HE. in several respects, although not perfectly.  Compare a close up still image of its face with WT 15000, or the Homo Erectus skull and its a reasonable fit.  Homo Erectus in the eyes of some was human and an ancestor of Homo Sapiens but several facts show that they were not humans or people.  They exhibit no human behavior and simply made the same stone tools for nearly millions of years.  This shows a static behavior, akin to animals, and no human advancement.  They probably had the mentality of a smart Cocker-Spaniel.  Theres no good evidence of them cooking food or wearing clothes, nothing.  Most Creationists and Evolutionists say they were people but the facts don't fit this.  Just because they are man-like in certain ways does not mean they were people.  When Eugene Duboise found his Java-man skull top back in 1891 he first used the term, Anthropopoithecus, meaning "Manape", but after several months he switched the name around to Pithecanthropus, or "Apeman", merely because the brain of the skull cap was in the lower human range.  I think he was correct to begin with and these are "manapes".  Patty(above) is a species that should be named, Anthropithecus Americanis.  Nearly all the so-called human ancestors and Neanderthals were pelt covered animals!!!  And each was distinct.  Homo Erectus can't be descended from Australopithecus because these creatures were getting more ape-like, with the more human looking ones being oldest.  See my next video, part 5, of Human Evolution. Recent finds also suggest a great deal of sexual dimorphism of Homo Erectus and this is a gorilla-like pattern.

 

sb
May 27, 2008

 

The number of deaths caused by the Spanish Inquisition has been greatly exaggerated by anti-christians and Atheists.  In the years between 1478 and 1834 a total of 130,000 people were processed by the Spanish Inquisition and about 2% of these were executed.  This is about 2300 people.  This number is very small compared to the deaths resulting from Socialist/Communist in the 20th century alone....perhaps 100 million people.  I should add that Adolf Hitler was a National Socialist.  The reason why I point this out is that theres a false political spectrum in common usage.  Its Right vs Left, but the real spectrum is Anarchy to Totalitarianism.  Its about the size of government and control; not left or right!  Socialist (Communists) are generally Atheistic, although Adolf Hitler was a pagan. They were all anti-God. 

In the United States we have what is called a Constitutional Republic, with limited government.  This is the best form of government and is the best for a free people.  Unfortunately many politicians in America show Socialist tendencies and advocate welfareism and high taxes.  The two go together.  This is why I scorn and have no respect for the Democrat party.  Its a real concern because some of these Democrats have attitudes similiar to Hitlers National Socialists in the 1930s...!  They want to close down private schools and institutions and stifle free speech, which they can't argue with....(enuff said for now!!!).

sb
May 27, 2008
Sorry, but the blog post could not be located.
sb
« older posts
DRSTEVE


to DRSTEVE

Recent Posts
Top Posts
Recent Comments
Categories
Archive
Syndication Tools
  • Subscribe to Flixya Blog Feed
  • Ping your RSS Feed
  • Add to Technorati Favorites!