gugenliang1's Blog

First, "the National Palace Museum," or "Forbidden City"
The National Palace Museum, as the representative of the East Building palaces, the world palace architecture model. 1987, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee will be included in the National Palace Museum "World Heritage List." Palace is the official name of "National Palace Museum" (The Palace Museum), but in Europe and the United States published in the tourist brochures, usually called "Forbidden City" (The Forbidden City), and added that it is China that - two dynasties of the Royal resident. Cengjinglaiguo or most of the world's tourists want to see the National Palace Museum, which is in the Hollywood film "The Last Emperor" shines with mysterious giant Royal Palace, would like to experience, is the splendor of the Orient monarchy and stirring times, and not only want to visit the National Palace Museum, displays artifacts. Palace of the Royal Palace in nature, it is far greater than the possession of a museum function. In the National Palace Museum as the subconscious, a door set up in Tai Wo big-screen television guides the vision system has been proposed, in the experts argue, this ultimately did not plan to be implemented.

Second, "Who is the National Palace Museum"
National Palace Museum is the world's cultural heritage, in this sense, the National Palace Museum in the world. From the point of view of property ownership, the National Palace Museum as a subject of enormous real estate, before the Revolution of 1911, has always belonged to the Qing Dynasty Imperial all. When Feng Yuxiang Puyi will be expelled from the Forbidden City, it has been nationalized. This involves international law, the two important concepts: "nationalization" and "Government inherited." When a government based on the interests of the people or public needs, private property can be nationals or foreign public and private property acquisition or collection, and this is "nationalization." Revolutionary party member overthrow the monarchy's just action, should public opinion, at the people, the implementation of the "nationalization" means is legitimate. Therefore, the National Palace Museum only by the ROC Government.
People's Republic of China was proclaimed in 1949, the People's Republic of the Central People's Government to replace the legitimate government of the Republic of the status of a subject of international law, the state property has "alternate government inherited" - the National Palace Museum is no exception. And the "Republic of China" in the many property at home and abroad, the National Palace Museum are the property of the People's Republic of the Central People's Government to exercise.
"Constitution of the PRC" Article 2 states: "All power in the PRC belongs to the people", which of course, include the National Palace Museum on public property - the possession, use, disposal and the proceeds of power. Has been a part of the national heritage "Palace Museum" manages the National Palace Museum? Also built a huge administrative management system? Perhaps it is this reason, the National Palace Museum will be the manager of the Palace renovation project as a matter of its own internal dealt with the closure of its operations thereby triggering a series of controversies. "National Palace Museum has been commissioned to only one body, the National Palace Museum as a vector of human civilization and related matters have specific responsibility, it means that instead of the National Palace Museum ownership and the right to dispose of all." The legal status of the National Palace Museum, is subject to Chinese commissioned by the People's Republic of the Central People's Government, responsible for the management of state-owned (all the people) property agency.

Third, the National Palace Museum overhaul programme to be taken by the decision-making process
Palace overhaul is definitely "in Taisuitoushangdongcha" large-scale projects, the introduction of its refurbishment programme, which should Shen Shen, and the full feasibility studies by experts. However, the overhaul of the entire plan, the National Palace Museum experts between the hospital and there is a serious fragmentation of information.
On the one hand, including the National Palace Museum's internal experts, some experts have put forward opposing views - its extent beyond the imagination; on the other hand, the Palace manager said he does not know of opposing views. According to reports, a vice president of the National Palace Museum in talking about this issue very sure that he did not hear any objections, all leading experts agree that the programme. "National Palace Museum opened three expert feasibility studies, and no one indicated that he did not agree with." He said, if there is an objection, "that they will definitely not first-class experts." Not to say whether the National Palace Museum managers convened the domestic authority of the ancient architectural scholars, experts, Demonstration will really be the "know all without reserve", demonstrating the results of the overhaul in the final programme of whether to embody, and only one decision-making process, had violated the principle and spirit of the Constitution. "Constitution of the PRC" No. 2 also provides that: "the people in accordance with the law, through various channels and forms, to manage state affairs, economic and cultural undertakings and social affairs management." Overhaul such as the National Palace Museum a very huge impact on the public social services, not the direct participation of citizens is not justifiable in any way. National cultural relics administrative authorities can overhaul programme on the invitation of the National Palace Museum Various experts, regulatory agencies, ordinary citizens participate in the hearings, legal proceedings can be generally accepted that the best refurbishment programme.